Take an economic view.

—SAFe Lean-Agile Principle #1

 

Economic Framework

The Economic Framework is a set of decision rules that aligns everyone to the financial objectives of the Solution, and guides the economic decision-making process. It contains four primary constructs: Lean Budgeting, Epic funding and governance, decentralized economic decision-making, and job sequencing based on the Cost of Delay (CoD).

SAFe’s Lean-Agile Principle #1-Take an Economic View, highlights the key role of economics in successful Solution development. This article describes the primary aspects of taking an economic view, delivering early and often, and understanding other economic trade-off restrictions. In addition, Principle #9 – Decentralize decision-making, is another cornerstone of SAFe.

These principles come together in this article, which describes the Economic Frameworka set of decision rules aligning everyone to the mission and its financial constraints. That includes budget considerations driven from the program portfolio, as well as trade-offs that affect a particular Solution. In this context, portfolio fiduciaries can delegate decision authority to others, knowing that those decisions will align with the agreed-to economic guidelines.

Details

The primary purpose of the Economic Framework is to support effective, fast decision-making within the bounds of the larger economic picture. In turn, that requires three things:

  • An understanding of the rules for decision-making
  • The current local context
  • Relevant decision-making authority

To this end, many of the needed economic decision rules are embedded in various SAFe practices. Figure 1 summarizes where these rules and authorities occur.

Figure 1. SAFe constructs for economic decision-making

Each of these areas is described in the sections that follow.

Lean Budgeting

The first decision is a big one, as the Lean-Agile enterprise moves from project-based, cost-center accounting to a more streamlined leaner budgeting process, where the funding is allocated to long-lived Value Streams. Thereafter, the cost for each Program Increment (PI) is largely fixed, and scope is varied as necessary. Each value stream budget can then be adjusted over time at PI boundaries, based on the relative value that each value stream provides to the portfolio. This process is described further in the Lean Budgets article.

Epic Funding and Governance

Allocating funds to the value streams, (and thereby to the Agile Release Trains (ARTs)), is all well and good. But what happens when there are substantial, crosscutting concerns, such as portfolio Epics? Or significant local investment concerns as represented by value stream or program epics? Empowered funding requires the parallel responsibility to communicate any investments that are unexpected. This is the primary purpose of the Portfolio Kanban System, and its related portfolio large solution, and program epics. Each requires a lean business case and an explicit approval process. (See the Epic article and the Lean Portfolio governance section of the LPM article.)

Decentralized Economic Decision-Making

With these budget elements in place, the Enterprise then empowers people—particularly Product and Solution Management—with the relevant context, knowledge, and authority necessary to make content decisions at each level of the framework. Of course, they don’t act alone, as they work with their larger stakeholder community to determine the best path. But in the end, the decision is theirs. That is their primary responsibility and authority.

Job Sequencing Based on Cost of Delay

Every significant program has a host of new backlog Features and Capabilities, just waiting to be implemented to increase the efficacy of the solution. But SAFe is a flow-based system, whose economics are optimized by job-sequencing rather than theoretical job ROI; or, worse, first-come, first-served job selection. Picking the right next job is where the greatest economic benefit lies. This is enabled by the Program and Solution Kanban systems, and the Program and Solution Backlog staging areas. Jobs are pulled into implementation based on Weighted Shortest Job First (WSJF), versus using job size as a proxy for duration.

Practices Provide the Form. People Make the Decisions

This article described the built-in SAFe constructs for economic decision-making. They provide a comprehensive foundation for effective decision-making based on the economics of the portfolio and value stream. SAFe also defines the roles and responsibilities of those who live in the decision-making chain. However, those decisions don’t make themselves. Lean-Agile Leaders continually apply these constructs and educate others in their use. This way, responsible decision-making happens throughout the development organization, bringing the full economic benefits of Lean-Agile development to the enterprise.


Learn More

[1] Reinertsen, Donald G. The Principles of Product Development Flow: Second Generation Lean Product Development. Celeritas Publishing, 2009.

Last update: 19 June, 2017